I've noticed that the 17 pdr gun in the Firefly has a longer barrel than the M10 Achilles . The breechs must weight the same as a counter weight was added to the Achilles to make up for the lost barrel lenghth and keep the gun balanced . Any idea why ?
The 17 pounder was the same gun in both tanks so the barrel lengths were the same. If the lengths are different it is probably due to how the gun was mounted in the turrets of each tank.
Still not sure . All the pictures I've seen , make the Achilles barrel look shorter , optical allusion maybe ? True never seen a picture of an Achillies and Firefly side by side so it's hard to really compare . OK if the barrel was the same length on both , what was added to the Achilles' breech end so the counter weight was needed ? A Gyro -Stabililiser maybe , did the original M 10 have one ? That might account for it . Then again the Sherman had one , but it might have been removed by the Brits so the 17 pounder could fit into the Sherman turret . Another un answered question . damm , my head hurts .
Post by barkingdigger on Nov 10, 2013 14:54:55 GMT -5
It is partly an illusion, and partly the different mount. The M10 had more room in the turret, and the gun was mounted a bit further back in relation to the trunions to fit the cradle in behind the mantlet due to the design of the turret front, making it tail-heavy, so to balance it they needed extra weight on the front. The Firefly, by comparison, had to be modified with a shortened mount because there wasn't enough room in the turret for normal recoil distance back from the Sherman trunions - hence the gun was "pushed forward" in its new cradle and was actually nose-heavy. (They solved this by making the breech slightly bigger during the redesign...) This means more of the barrel sticks out from the front of the Firely mantlet, even though both guns were the same total length from muzzle to back of breech. Naturally, the Firefly-specific mods to the barrel and breech meant they were not interchangeable with M10C tubes.
I don't think the Achilles had a stabiliser, and I thought they were removed from Fireflies during conversion, but would need to check. I recall reading that most Sherman crews turned them off anyway, as they were more work than they were worth...
None of the TDs had gyrostabilizers, and the Brits removed them from all their Shermans. Their original shoot-on-the-move doctrine called for gunners to manually compensate for the motion of the tank. That sorta worked with small weapons like the 2pdr, which actually had a shoulder-rest so the gunner could try to aim it like a deer rifle. It didn't work with bigger guns at all. Also true that these primitive stabilizers were difficult to keep operational and weren't all that effective.
"You could probably use some armor. A Sherman can give you a very nice...edge!"