I am not trying to start any trouble with this post. What are everyone's thoughts on DML Sherman kits? I have my eye on two of them. The Sherman III mid production,with markings for Sicily,and the M4 Normandy version. I know with the Sherman III,the M34 gun mantlet is not right. I know TMD has a correction for it. I want to build an M4 with markings from the Saunders academy from the Girls und Panzer anime series.
For anyone who watches that show online after reading this post,I am in no way responsible for what happens to your brain after watching it. The reason I am thinking of using the DML M4,instead of the Tamiya version is, the Tamiya version has them sunken weld beads,and I really suck at weld beads. I do not know of any resin upper hull with the correct weld beads for the Tamiya kit.
A tank filled with holes.
For that is what shall become.
Boom we go.
Goodbye.
Both of those kits are decent kits. Bear in mind that they are not tasca quality and will take some time test fitting the hull components. I hear they are the better kits from Dragon.
I have built in the last year my last DML Sherman. I say this because the Tasca, {Asuka} kits are so much better. The DML Sherman in question was the M-4 Normandy. I found that may parts still share the Italleri sprues and the periscope mounts were not quite round to fit in the driver / co-driver hatches. This is billed as one of DML latest releases. So sad. If DML would pay more attention to the Sherman kits and other Allied armor in general like they do with the U.S. Halftrack I would change my opinion. As long as Asuka cranks out M-4 DML is not in the house.
Tasca/Asuka is definitely the way to go. Their fit is impeccable, and fineness of detail better than Dragon. The few variants which Tasca/Asuka do not kit can be put together by using their spare-sprues service. An M4, for example, can be done by obtaining the Firefly Hybrid kit and an M4A2 upper hull. A little work will be needed to adjust the rear plate angle and to fit a correct antenna pot on the glacis, depending on which factory you wish to do. Dragon's wet-stowage large hatch M4A1 upper hull isn't bad, but I would fit that onto a Tasca/Asuka lower hull assembly. Tamiya's two IDF Shermans, the M1 and M51, also provide a very nice upper hull which represents a different factory from the General Steel one that DML models. Tamiya is always a little irritating in that they do silly things to this day, like molding grab handles solid and making no provision for open periscopes, as well as always having a fixed suspension. Still, the basic shapes are always spot-on and their M51 kit provides the ONLY correctly-sized muzzle brake available anywhere.
"You could probably use some armor. A Sherman can give you a very nice...edge!"
Tasca/Asuka is definitely the way to go. Their fit is impeccable, and fineness of detail better than Dragon. The few variants which Tasca/Asuka do not kit can be put together by using their spare-sprues service. An M4, for example, can be done by obtaining the Firefly Hybrid kit and an M4A2 upper hull. A little work will be needed to adjust the rear plate angle and to fit a correct antenna pot on the glacis, depending on which factory you wish to do. Dragon's wet-stowage large hatch M4A1 upper hull isn't bad, but I would fit that onto a Tasca/Asuka lower hull assembly. Tamiya's two IDF Shermans, the M1 and M51, also provide a very nice upper hull which represents a different factory from the General Steel one that DML models. Tamiya is always a little irritating in that they do silly things to this day, like molding grab handles solid and making no provision for open periscopes, as well as always having a fixed suspension. Still, the basic shapes are always spot-on and their M51 kit provides the ONLY correctly-sized muzzle brake available anywhere.
Thanks for the tips Beekster. I did order some spare sprues from them.
A tank filled with holes.
For that is what shall become.
Boom we go.
Goodbye.